Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research. Its audience includes; Cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, electrophysiologists, interventionalists, internists, nurses and others interested in cardiovascular medicine.
On the 8th November Steven R Gundry published a paper called, “Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS ( acute coronary syndrome) Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning”. Steven Gundry is an American doctor and author. He is a former cardiac surgeon and currently runs his own clinic, investigating the impact of diet on health, and was a pioneer in infant heart transplant surgery. Steven Gundry is also a New York Times best-selling author of The Plant Paradox: The Hidden Dangers in “Healthy” Foods That Cause Disease and Weight Gain.
The Afrikan Heritage Online shares with our readers; Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning.
Abstract 10712 states, ” Our group has been using the PULS Cardiac Test a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).” In other words, The PULS Cardiac Test is a simple, non-invasive blood test that predicts the likelihood of a patient having a heart attack within the next five years. It works by detecting the true leading cause of heart attacks: Unstable Cardiac Lesion Ruptures.
The abstract goes on to say, “The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers.” A biomarker is, a biological molecule found in blood, other body fluids, or tissues that is a sign of a normal or abnormal process, or of a condition or disease. A biomarker may be used to see how well the body responds to a treatment for a disease or condition. Also called molecular marker and signature molecule
Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score. Recently, with the advent of the MRNA COVID 19 vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.
Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
According to a report presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2021, held from November 13 to 15, 2021, the risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
A study that included 566 men and women in a (1:1) ratio, aged 28-97 years, who were patients in a preventive cardiology practice received a new PULS Cardiac Test 2-10 weeks after their second COVID-19 vaccine. The test result was compared with a PULS score from 3-5 months pre-vaccination. The PULS Cardiac Test measures multiple protein biomarkers, including hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], soluble Fas, and IL-16, and used the results to calculate a 5-year risk score for new ACS. The PULS score increases with above-normal elevation. All participants received this test every 3-6 months for 8 years.
The study author concluded that “mRNA [vaccines] dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
The question is, will Barbados see an increase in heart attacks and heart related problems in 5 yrs time due to the government’s COVID-19 vaccination program? I think the Heart and Stroke Foundation should weigh in on this matter. I am also of the opinion that it is the duty of our media houses to publish the results of such research being done, so that Barbadians can make more informed choices on whether they wished to risk taking the COVID-19 Vaccine or not. Do I want to take a vaccine now for a flu like disease that may cause me to have a heart attack in 5 years time?
In Trinidad we have a saying that goes, “what sweet in goat mouth, does sour in the bam bam”. This saying just rushed into my mind as I thought, most people are taking this vaccine now and feeling fine, but what will happen should this research prove to be on point? Who will be held accountable should we have a situation of mass heart attacks in Barbados?
Ras Simba Akoma
Our Afrikan Heritage Online.